Etching, Encylcopaedia Britannica 1911 |
An old friend found
Nasruddin in the street, walking up and down disconsolately. “What are you doing?” he asked. “Looking for the key to my house,” said
Nasruddin. “You dropped it somewhere
here?” “No,” said Nasruddin, “I dropped
it in my shed.” “Then why are you
looking for it out in the street?” “Because
here it is light. In my shed is pitch
dark, and I will never be able to find it.”
So, sethren, we must
first know where to look.
If we were looking for
an animal…
“King Philip came over from Greece smiling.” So says Jonnie Hughes, he of On
the Origin of Tepees fame, though not fame enough for our purposes, for
he spoke unto the gentiles, and they listened not, or not as deeply as one
would have hoped.
King Philip… It’s an acronym. Kingdom phylum class order family genus
species. Good God! Did someone say Linnaeus. No, ‘twas but the derisive fart of a
departing bus. But we are not
dismayed. Linnaeus it is. His taxonomy of animals. Beautifully ordered as a hierarchy, so each
superordinate category contains all and only the categories next on down.
But culture is what we
are examining, and in the light of culture, we on this island, and particularly
you lot in the northern half of the next continent moving leftwards, are weird. Let us look elsewhere, initially to the
southern half of that continent, but more importantly to the major fraction of
mankind who do not think as we do.
Categories of animal:
(a)
belonging to the emperor, (b) embalmed, (c)
tame, (d) sucking pigs, (e) sirens, (f) fabulous, (g) stray dogs, (h) included
in the present classification, (i) frenzied, (j) innumerable, (k) drawn with a
very fine camelhair brush, (l) et cetera, (m) having just broken the water
pitcher, (n) that from a long way off look like flies.
Now we’re talking,
sethren. This is what that almost manic fan of all formulations Encyclopaedic,
Jorge Luis Borges, attributes, through doctor Franz Kuhn, “to a certain Chinese
encyclopaedia entitled 'Celestial Empire of benevolent Knowledge'.”
Here we have a
taxonomy in an entirely different style from that of the rational Linnaeus.
Here things may be included in several categories, or none (depending on the
place of (l) et cetera in the hierarchy which does not exist).
Who could ask for
more.
So, for the analysis
of culture I propose a taxonomy not Linnaean, not Borgean, but Jeroan. And here, my dears, I lay it out on the grimy
pavement before you.
Brother Jero’s
taxonomy of the Metaverse (or “The Jeronaean taxonomy”.)
Culture praxis map concept action thing demon
No comments:
Post a Comment