Skellig Michael - Wikimedia commons |
Supposing all you say is so, so what? We are still beset by
unwholesome weather, and eat muck. And now we have been told by our noble
leader that social security leads to infanticide. Sethren, our noble leader may have the mouth
parts of a six foot tapeworm, but he also has a first class degree from
Oxford. PPE, admittedly. I have no more idea than you what
cutting-edge intellectual content resides in a degree in Philosophy, Politics
and Economics from Oxford. Nugatory, one would imagine. But enough
to rule. And the tyro tapeworm clearly had enough brain to master it
splendidly. A first class degree.
Sethren, the mouthings of the great leader may evince stupidity, but they are
designer mouthings, crafted by years, centuries of evolution to embody a
gargantuan gormlessness. Not his. Ours. Our stupidity,
sethren. The stupidity inheres not in the crafting of these obvious,
children’s picture book, fatuous lies. The gargantuan stupidity is in us,
who are the butt of this ludicrous mendacity. And yet we believe in it
utterly, and remouth it and remouth it continually, as if we ourselves were not
as withered grey-green carcasses on the Huddersfield ringroad, but plump pink
tapeworms whose every comfort is eternally assured.
Surely, sethren, our so thoroughgoing stupidity needs some explanation.
The last person to try to explain it was Karl Marx; false consciousness, opium
of the masses; spot on, old Karl. But a century and a half ago. The
Communist Manifesto was published nine years before The Origin of
Species. Nobody has attempted to explain our moronic collective
credulity since then.
I
will.
But first the building blocks.
An
act. A kinetic four dimensional amplification of a sequence of alliances
of demons.
In
the human world, maybe in the Hominin world (and I read on my phone yesterday,
sethren, that Sahelpithecus is likely to represent the divergence
between Homo and Chimp, seven million years ago or thereabouts), in the
human world, an act is seldom isolated from a thing. “Manus amimam
pinxit, my pen is in my hand” as the old fascist put it. There is not
much that we do with our bare hands. Throttle people, make bread and
love. But by and large a human act is an obligate symbiont with at least
one thing. It is the nexus of doing and done to — obligate symbiont,
Sether Albert? Have I not mentioned it before? Oh. No I fucking
haven’t, then. Two different kinds of organism living in a cooperative
relationship upon which both are completely dependent; trees and root fungi,
mammals and their gut bacteria; human beings and politicians.
Think of sewing, sethren. Sewing without needle, thread and two bits of
material to be joined, is not sewing. But a needle and thread and so on
cannot be sewing without kinesis, fingers, musculature, neural substrate.
Most human acts can only exist in the context of things. And most things
can only evolve in the context of acts. The old joke goes, when a simple
lad had finally been taught to add two apples to two apples and get four
apples, he asked, “does it work with pears too?” Does the concept of
obligate symbiosis work with acts other than sewing? Pears, sethren,
pears.
At
the level of demons, there is no distinction to be made between an act and a
thing. An act is a thing. Sewing, like a needle, is a
demon. Sure, as with a needle, other demons consort with the demon
sewing, many more than the minimal ones we associated with a needle. We
could anatomise the demon sewing into quite a lot, or if you prefer, a whole
bunch of demons. But if you are running your eye over the contents of a
design technology course to see if it is suitable for one, oh ye paupers, of
your profligate quantity of offspring (whom, because you may rely on social
security, you are quite likely to go home and slaughter) and in the midst of a
list of course components, joinery, web design, you note for the fraction of a
second your eye overflies it embroidery before the epicentre of vision moves on
to automobile aesthetics; then embroidery occurred as a demon; not totally
unexamined, because there will be a locus in the neural substrate which awakes
and leaps to life screaming me, me, and would be only too delighted to call up
other demons into the workspace, needles, coloured thread, the Bayeux tapestry,
whatever the fuck you like as long as you are going to take notice; but not a
chance. The automobile aesthetics demon
is already having its microsecond flicker.
So, at the demon level, things and acts are not differentiated. But, you
will say, we humans can distinguish between a thing and an act.
Sethren, we can distinguish between a trillion things and another trillion
things, had we but world enough and time. We have no difficulty
telling the difference between angels and fairies, between cricket and
baseball, between a virus and a bacterium or a gigue and a saraband. But
we do it at another level. We shall come to concepts in time, sethren,
but you will not be amazed to know that concepts, like everything in the
metaverse, are also alliances of demons.
For it is only at the demon level that evolution can take place.
But, you
may say, the ancestral organism became the hippo and the whale. Surely it
is at the level of species that things change?
That is
what we see, because we cannot see genes.
Darwin didn’t even know they existed.
But it was genes, sethren (and
epigenetics, of course). Evolution takes place at the level of the cell,
and it is only the sum of cells that is the organism that represents the, to
us, apprehensible species.
And you will say, but culture doesn’t have to be like biological life.
Just because evolution takes place at the level of genes, not the level of the
hippo and the whale, there is no reason why culture should follow suit.
Agreed absolutely, sethren. Give me another explanation that will lead to
an account of why we believe the simple lies of our Great Leader, an
explanation that does not rest on metaphor and religious platitude, and I will
go along with you. Until then, the evolution of culture takes place at
the level of demons.
The question still lies open, can there be a non-kinetic act? Clearly.
Acts can take place in an ideoverse unexpressed by any kinesis. You
cannot look into the face of the beloved and know of whom they dream. The
raven surveyed the meat, the string, its perch for several minutes before it
acted. The high jumper clears the bar before she starts her run-up.
This, sethren, is why I call it an act, not an action. All that we do
happens in the theatre of the skull.
Sethren, tomorrow, sabbatical. I go to the monastery of Skellig Michael
to watch and pray for a week. You must wander the streets of Huddersfield
alone. Watch the behaviour of your fellows, and ponder my words.
Dwell on our stupidity in especial. When I return, and if, in like case
to the Earl of Groan, I am not consumed by puffins, then concepts.
No comments:
Post a Comment